Talk:Erwin N. Hiebert

Feedback from New Page Review process

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Expertly constructed and a well-warranted page.

Klbrain (talk) 04:46, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm. I also reviewed this today, and I do not agree with the conclusions of @Klbrain. As an APS Fellow he is notable. However, large parts of the page are unsourced. There is a strong possibility that someone will delete everything that is unsourced, this happens (I don't do it but I have seen it). Please repair the page by including proper sources for everything. Also, the format is different from normal, please revise so it is more readable including things like a scientist infobox and picture. Ldm1954 (talk) 05:59, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]